Desain Instruksional Eksperimen Sains Sederhana Pada Anak Usia Dini

Ika  Candra Destiyanti

doi:10.33222/pelitapaud.v8i2.3793

Ika Candra Destiyanti Universitas Islam AL Ihya Kuningan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33222/pelitapaud.v8i2.3793

Abstract

Eksperimen sains untuk anak usia dini menjadi media dalam melatih anak mengembangkan ide dan kreativitas nya di sekolah. Desain Instruksional dengan konteks eksperimen sains di kelas paud akan melatih daya kritis anak terutama dalam pemecahan masalah meskipun melatih anak belajar sambil bermain namun eksperimen sains ini dapat melatih siswa dalam daya nalar dan penemuan makna. Tujuan Riset ini untuk mengetahui desain instruksional ekperimen sains di kelas PAUD. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian Kualitatif, Dua Puluh siswa kelas B dengan rentan usia 5 hingga 6 tahun berpartisipasi dalam proyek eksperimen sains sederhana bermain gelembung gajah Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses eksperimen sains sederhana membantu siswa untuk terlibat secara aktif dalam memilih bahan eksperimen menguji dan menganalisis bahan bahan eksperimen sains sederhana dan menghasilkan ide kreatif untuk mengenal tema gelembung dan bermain dari bahan eksperimen sains sederhana. Implikasi pedagogis dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa media pembelajaran eksperimen sains sederhana mendorong keterlibatan siswa dalam proses mengembangkan bernalar kritis dan meningkatkan kreativitas siswa tingkat PAUD memahami materi perubahan warna maupun reaksi kimia.

Keywords: Ekperimen, Desain, sains, Paud

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anggrahini, D. 2018. “Anggrahini, D. (2018). Meningkatkan Kecerdasan Sosial Emosional Anak Melalui Implementasi Metode Bermain Dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Jurnal: Ceria. 1 (1), 6-14.” Jurnal: Ceria 1(1):6–14.

Aronoff, M, Aronoff, M. 1996. The Careless Society: Community and Its Counterfeits. Vol. 4. Contemporary Sociology.

Barkhuizen, G., Benson, P., & Chik, A. 2013. Barkhuizen, G., Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2013). Narrative Inquiry in Language Teaching and Learning Research. Routledge. Routledge.

Brooks, J. 2015. Brooks, J. (2015). Big Science for Growing Minds: Constructivist Classrooms for Young Thinkers. Teachers College Press. Teachers College Press.

Clandinin, D. J. (Ed.). 2006. Clandinin, D. J. (Ed.). (2006). Handbook of Narrative Inquiry: Mapping a Methodology. Sage Publications. Sage Publications.

Counsell, S., & Sander, M. 2016. Counsell, S., & Sander, M. (2016). Using Ramps in Diverse Learning Communities. STEM Learning with Young Children: Inquiry Teaching with Ramps and Pathways, 29-51.

Destiyanti, Ika Candra. 2022. “PERMAINAN TRADISIONAL: PERKEMBANGAN MOTORIK ANAK SAAT BERMAIN DI SEKOLAH.” Jurnal Ilmiah ATSAR Kuningan 2(1):52–57.

DeVries, R., & Zan, B. 1994. DeVries, R., & Zan, B. (1994). Moral Classrooms, Moral Children: Creating a Constructivist Atmosphere in Early Education (Vol. 47). Teachers College Press. Vol. 47. Teachers College Press.

DeVries, R., Zan, B., Hildebrandt, C., Edmiaston, R., & Sales, C. 2002. “DeVries, R., Zan, B., Hildebrandt, C., Edmiaston, R., & Sales, C. (2002). Developing Constructivist Early Childhood Curriculum: Practical Principles and Activities. Early Childhood Education Series. Teachers College Press, PO Box 20, Williston, VT 05495-0020.” Teachers College Press, PO Box 20, Williston,.

Hitchcock, Chuck, Anne Meyer, David Rose, and Richard Jackson. 2002. “Providing New Access to the General Curriculum: Universal Design for Learning.” TEACHING Exceptional Children 35(2):8–17. doi: 10.1177/004005990203500201.

Husin, S. H., & Yaswinda, Y. 2021. “Husin, S. H., & Yaswinda, Y. (2021). Analisis Pembelajaran Sains Anak Usia Dini Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(2), 581-595.” Jurnal Basicedu 5(2):581–95.

James, Nadja. 2018. “Using Narrative Inquiry to Explore the Experience of One Ethnically Diverse ESL Nursing Student.” Teaching and Learning in Nursing 13(1):35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.teln.2017.08.002.

Jones, Ithel, Vickie E. Lake, and Ummuhan Dagli. 2003a. “Integrating Mathematics and Science in Undergraduate Early Childhood Teacher Education Programs.” Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 24(1):3–8. doi: 10.1080/1090102030240103.

Jones, Ithel, Vickie E. Lake, and Ummuhan Dagli. 2003b. “Integrating Mathematics and Science in Undergraduate Early Childhood Teacher Education Programs.” Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 24(1):3–8. doi: 10.1080/1090102030240103.

Lang, Michael, Catherine Laing, Carol Ewashen, and Nancy Moules. 2020. “Digital Stories as Data: An Etymological and Philosophical Exploration of Cocreated Data in Philosophical Hermeneutic Health Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19:160940692091367. doi: 10.1177/1609406920913673.

Manankil-Rankin, Louela. 2016. “Moving From Field Text to Research Text in Narrative Inquiry: A Study Exemplar.” Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 48(3–4):62–69. doi: 10.1177/0844562116684728.

Marliza, R., & Eliza, D. n.d. “Marliza, R., & Eliza, D. Peningkatan Keterampilan Proses Sains Melalui Kegiatan Belajar Tanaman Di Taman Kanak-Kanak Aba Air Bangis.”

Piaget, J. 1971. “Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and Knowledge: An Essay on the Relations between Organic Regulations and Cognitive Processes.”

Seefeldt, C., & Wasik, B. A. 2008. “Seefeldt, C., & Wasik, B. A. (2008). Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Jakarta: PT Indeks, 323.” PT Indeks, 323.

Stephen Kemmis, S. K., & Robin McTaggart, R. M. 2014. “Stephen Kemmis, S. K., & Robin McTaggart, R. M. (2014). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer.” Springer.

Tu, Tsunghui. 2006. “Preschool Science Environment: What Is Available in a Preschool Classroom?” Early Childhood Education Journal 33(4):245–51. doi: 10.1007/s10643-005-0049-8.

Widodo, Handoyo Puji. 2016. “Language Policy in Practice: Reframing the English Language Curriculum in the Indonesian Secondary Education Sector.” Pp. 127–51 in English Language Education Policy in Asia. Vol. 11, Language Policy, edited by R. Kirkpatrick. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Widodo, Handoyo Puji. 2018. “Review of Innovation and Change in English Language Education.” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 12(2):193–97. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2015.1124621.